catholicdaily.co
Blog
BIBLE
  • Bible Versions
  • Verse of the Day
  • Verses by Topic
  • Reading Plans
  • Parallel Bible
  • Books of the Bible
  • Compare Translations
  • Audio Bible
  • Interlinear Bible
STUDY
  • Library
  • Commentaries
  • Concordances
  • Dictionaries
  • Encyclopedias
  • Devotionals
  • Lexicons (Strong's)
  • Bible Studies
  • Blog & Articles
  • Catechism (CCC)
  • Daily Liturgy
  • Historical Creeds
  • Bible Stories
TOOLS
  • Bible Trivia & Canon
  • Sunday School & Plans
  • Pastor Resources
  • Church History
Blog
Forums
πŸ“° NewslettersGet Your Bible Minute in Your Inbox Every Morning
73-Book Catholic CanonBible VersionsDaily Mass ReadingsCatechism (CCC)Blog
Privacy PolicyTerms of UseDMCA PolicyCatholic CommentariesHistorical Creeds
✝catholicdaily.co

Dedicated to the complete 73-book Catholic Canon (including the 7 Deuterocanonical books), Daily Mass liturgical readings, the Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC), Hebrew & Greek interlinear lexicons, Catholic commentaries, and daily Scripture meditation.

Copyright Β© 2026 catholicdaily.co. All rights reserved.
Privacy PolicyΒ·Terms of UseΒ·DMCA
Commentariesβ€’George Leo Haydock Catholic Bible Commentaryβ€’Genesis 16
Ch. 15Read Chapter TextCh. 17
Rev. George Leo Haydock

Genesis 16 Commentary

George Leo Haydock Catholic Bible Commentary (10 verse expositions)

123456789101112131415161718
Genesis 16:2Lemma: β€œMay have”
β€œShe said to her husband: Behold, the Lord hath restrained me from bearing: go in unto my handmaid, it may be I may have children of her at least. And when he agreed to her request,”

May have. Hebrew, β€œmay be built up,” a metaphorical expression: so God is said to have built up houses for the Egyptian midwives, Exodus i. 21. (Menochius)

Genesis 16:3Lemma: β€œTen years”
β€œShe took Agar the Egyptian her handmaid, ten years after they first dwelt in the land of Chanaan, and gave her to her husband to wife.”

Ten years after she was 65; which shews that she might reasonably conclude she would now have no children herself; and as she knew God had promised Abram a son, she thought he might follow the custom of those times, and have him by a second wife. Abram shewed no eagerness on this matter, but only yielded to his wife’s petition, deprecanti, being well aware of the inconveniences of polygamy, which Sarai had soon reason to observe. This is the first time we read of polygamy since the deluge; but it is not mentioned as any thing singular or unlawful. This was a matter in which God could dispense; but it was never left to the disposal of any man. Hence, when Luther and his associates ventured to dispense with the Landgrave of Hesse, to keep two wives at once, he required him to keep it a secret, being ashamed of his own conduct. He still maintained it was a thing indifferent, even in the law of grace, though Christ has so expressly condemned it. See prΔ™p 62, 65. The practice, so common of late in this country, of marrying again after a bill of divorce has been passed, is no less contrary to the Catholic doctrine, which allows only a separation of the parties from bed and board, in cases of adultery; but never of a second marriage, while both the parties are living. (1 Corinthians vii.; St. Augustine de Adult. Conj. i., City of God xvi. 25, 38; and other fathers.) (Haydock) β€” It was never lawful for one woman to have two husbands. (Worthington) β€” To wife. Plurality of wives, though contrary to the primitive institution of marriage, Genesis ii. 24, was by Divine dispensation allowed to the patriarchs; which allowance seems to have continued during the time of the law of Moses. But Christ our Lord reduced marriage to its primitive institution, St. Matthew xix.

Genesis 16:5Lemma: β€œDespiseth”
β€œAnd Sarai said to Abram: Thou dost unjustly with me: I gave my handmaid into thy bosom, and she perceiving herself to be with child, despiseth me. The Lord judge between me and thee.”

Despiseth. Few bear prosperity in a proper manner! β€” And thee. Sarai thinks it is the duty of her husband to restrain the insolence of Agar. She commits her cause to God, and does not seek revenge. (Menochius)

Genesis 16:6Lemma: β€œAfflicted her”
β€œAnd Abram made answer, and said to her: Behold thy handmaid is in thy own hand, use her as it pleaseth thee. And when Sarai afflicted her, she ran away.”

Afflicted her, as she now resented even a moderate correction. (Haydock)

Genesis 16:7Lemma: β€œIn the desert”
β€œAnd the angel of the Lord having found her, by a fountain of water in the wilderness, which is in the way to Sur in the desert,”

In the desert; omitted in Hebrew being a repetition of in the wilderness. (Calmet)

Genesis 16:9Lemma: β€œHumble thyself”
β€œAnd the angel of the Lord said to her: Return to thy mistress, and humble thyself under her hand.”

Humble thyself. The angel, in God’s name, does not blame Sarai; but gives Agar to understand that the fault was wholly on her side. (Haydock)

Genesis 16:11Lemma: β€œIsmael”
β€œAnd again: Behold, said he, thou art with child, and thou shalt bring forth a son: and thou shalt call his name Ismael, because the Lord hath heard thy affliction.”

Ismael, means β€œGod hath heard” the groans and distress of Agar. (Calmet)

Genesis 16:12Lemma: β€œWild”
β€œHe shall be a wild man: his hand will be against all men, and all men’s hands against him: and he shall pitch his tents over against all his brethren.”

Wild. Hebrew: like a wild ass, not to be tamed or subdued. The Saracens or Arabs, have almost all along maintained their independence. β€” Over against, ready to fight, without any dread of any one. (Calmet)

Genesis 16:13Lemma: β€œThou the God”
β€œAnd she called the name of the Lord that spoke unto her: Thou the God who hast seen me. For she said: Verily, here have I seen the hinder parts of him that seeth me.”

Thou the God. She had imagined before that she was talking to some man; but perceiving, at parting, that it was some superior being, she invoked him thus. β€”The hinder parts, as Moses did afterwards, Exodus xxxiii, to let us know, that we cannot fully comprehend the nature of an angel, much less of God. Hebrew may be: β€œwhat! have I seen (do I live) after He has seen me.” The Hebrews generally supposed, that death would presently overtake the person who had seen the Lord or his angel. (Judges vi. 22; Exodus xxxii.[xxxiii.?] 20.) (Calmet)

Genesis 16:15Lemma: β€œAgar”
β€œAnd Agar brought forth a son to Abram: who called his name Ismael.”

Agar being returned home, and having obtained pardon. β€” Ismael, as the angel had foretold; an honour shewn to very few; such as Isaac, Solomon, Jesus, &c. (Haydock)